From here you can review and participate in the discussion of the proposed XHTML standard for Dictionary input to Pathway. This standard has been drafted by Jim Albright. If you have input, feel free to make comments or proposals in the following documents:
Sample Output File
Input XHTML for Sample Output File
Style sheet for Dictionary Output
Sample Dictionary Cascading Style Sheet


I started the Dictionary XHTML.Doc file but wanted input to know if this is useful, too much, too little before spending a lot of time on it. I guess there will only be a dozen people every looking at the underlying code …. Famous last words? It is only partially done. Scripture is more complete but still a work in progress. Your inputs are desired.
For me I prefer to see actual working documents but some might want more details. Please advise as to what you want. Phil Murdy with Biblica is also looking over my shoulder on the Scripture XHTML.
Jim A.
I looked at it. What is your feeling about approaching the micro-format community about this?
I am looking at this standard a bit more and am a bit excited about what you are doing here. A couple of notes: The xhtml output does not declare a doctype.
It seems that the output in terms of
elements anelements makes some sense in terms of structure. What does not make sense is the use of these elements when xhtml has elements for the headword and the defining termThank you for taking time to look at what I have done.
Yes, we can add a DOCTYPE.
No, I don’t think we need to engage another format group.
I think the XHTML adequately handles a complex dictionary. That was the task. If you find something lacking please let me know.
Using classes to identify items is very useful. It is easy to handle in the CSS.
Pingback: Interoperability of online dictionary data: A test case using WordPress as a CMS | The Journeyler